ESG assessment summary by portfolio company

appendix-table-01
appendix-table-02
appendix-table-03
appendix-table-04

Principal Adverse Impacts indicator chart

appendix-ref-funds
Truck_icon
4 963 71
Tons CO₂e
Scope 1 GHG emissions³
Chord_icon
4 669 108
Tons CO₂e
Scope 2 GHG emissions³
Train_plane_icon
124 840 4 531
Tons CO₂e
Scope 3 GHG emissions³
GHG_Icon
134 472 4 710
Tons CO₂e
Total: GHG emissions
(Scope 1, 2 & 3)³
money_ghg
216 21
Tons CO₂e/M€ capital
Carbon footprint³
Time_ghg
248 174
Tons CO₂e/M€ revenue
Carbon intensity of investee
companies
Industry
%
51% 82%
% share
Non-renewable energy
consumption
Fan-wind
%
49% 18%
% share
Non-renewable energy
consumption
Gage_icon
0 0
GWh//M€ revenue
Energy intensity of investee
companies
Path 3788
0% 0%
Activities negatively affecting
biodiversity-sensitive areas
water_icon
9 0
Tons
Emissions to water³
Toxic_icon
3 453 0
Tons
Hazardous waste (generated)³
people_icon
1 876 184
Number of employees (FTE)⁴
re-ppl_icon
%
9% 4%
Staff turnover rate for all
employees⁴
Group 2514
%
37% 42%
Tons CO₂e
Scope 3 GHG emissions³
Group 2515
%
26% 32%
Percentage of management &
executives who are female⁴
Woman
%
23 17
Percentage of board who
are female
Gender
%
16% 22%
Unadjusted gender paygap⁴
Stop_icon
%
0% 0%
Violations of UNGC Principles
or OECD Guidelines for
Multinational Corporations
NA_icon

Lack of compliance
mechanisms for UNGC
Principles and OECD
Guidelines for Multinational
Corporations⁶

Money_icon
%
0% 0%
Companies without anti-corruption/anti-bribery
policies⁷
PRisoner_icon
%
0% 0%
Number of identified cases of
severe human rights issues
and incidents
Gas_icon
%
0% 0%
Exposure to companies active
in the fossil fuel sector
Bomb_Icon
%
0% 0%
Exposure to controversial
weapons
  1. Incl. Co-invests, excl. Olink
  2. Excl. Olink
  3. Emissions estimated by Summa’s share of EV. EV and equity share has been estimated using a standard method, accounting for net debt. Thus, for this reporting cycle the calculation does not conform to the definition provided in the Joint ESAS Final Report on RTS under SFDR. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/jc_2021_03_joint_esas_final_report_on_rts_under_sfdr.pdf
  1. This is not a Principal Adverse Impact indicator, but has been included for completeness. Calculation/weighting conforms to method used for other indicators in this chart.
  2. Excl Lakers, Documaster, Olink
  3. Indicator to be assessed fully during next reporting cycle
  4. Implementation status is as of Q2 2021. Olink, recent acquisitions & minorities have been excluded.